Fraport AG 削减成本并提升 SAP 从 Oracle 迁移到 IBM DB2 的性能
公司规模
Large Corporate
地区
- Europe
国家
- Germany
产品
- IBM DB2
- IBM AIX
- IBM Power Systems servers
- IBM System Storage DS8000
- SAP ERP
技术栈
- IBM DB2
- IBM AIX
- SAP ERP
实施规模
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
影响指标
- Cost Savings
- Productivity Improvements
技术
- 基础设施即服务 (IaaS) - 云数据库
- 基础设施即服务 (IaaS) - 云计算
适用行业
- 航天
适用功能
- 商业运营
用例
- 过程控制与优化
- 预测性维护
服务
- 云规划/设计/实施服务
- 系统集成
关于客户
75 年来，法兰克福机场集团一直是领先的机场运营商。法兰克福机场是全球十大机场之一。此外，法兰克福机场集团还是另外两家公司的主要股东，这两家公司在四大洲运营着另外十二家机场。每年，法兰克福机场集团总共运送超过 1.647 亿名乘客和 360 万吨货物。法兰克福机场集团在全球拥有 20,000 名员工，2010 年的销售额接近 22 亿欧元。与航空运输的所有方面一样，机场管理行业竞争激烈，利润非常微薄。因此，法兰克福机场集团始终关注运营效率，力求在保持和提高服务水平的同时削减业务各个方面的成本。公司的 IT 团队为降低成本做出了重要贡献——他们既开发了自动化业务流程的创新解决方案，又最大限度地降低了系统本身的运营成本。
挑战
Fraport AG 运营法兰克福国际机场，并参与全球其他 12 家机场的运营。为了在这个竞争激烈的行业中取得成功，该公司需要尽可能降低成本，同时保持卓越的服务水平。SAP® 系统是法兰克福国际机场运营的关键组成部分；但数据量增长迅速，使得这些系统的支持成本越来越高。由于数据量巨大，以及由此产生的对额外高速磁盘存储和处理能力的需求，维护 SAP 环境的成本迅速上升。Fraport 开始寻找改善这种情况的方法，IBM 建议从 Oracle 迁移到 DB2 数据库平台。
解决方案
通过与 IBM® 合作，该公司将其 SAP 应用程序从 Oracle 数据库平台迁移到 IBM DB2®。在成功的概念验证项目和一个月的精心规划之后，法兰克福数据中心托管的 26 个 SAP 系统的主要迁移工作在短短五个月内就完成了。随后，Fraport AG 将其服务器环境升级到最新的 IBM POWER7® 技术，从而带来了更多好处。使用在概念验证期间建立的相同迁移流程，Fraport 团队能够在短短五个月内将 26 个 SAP 系统（包括生产、开发和质量保证环境）从 Oracle 迁移到 DB2。主要应用程序包括 SAP ERP 6.0、SAP ERP 人力资本管理 (HCM)、SAP 客户关系管理 (CRM)、SAP 供应商关系管理 (SRM)、SAP NetWeaver 门户、SAP NetWeaver 业务仓库 (BW) 和 SAP NetWeaver 流程集成 (PI)。
运营影响
数量效益
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
相关案例.
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
Case Study
Developing Smart Tools for the Airbus Factory
Manufacturing and assembly of aircraft, which involves tens of thousands of steps that must be followed by the operators, and a single mistake in the process could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix, makes the room for error very small.
Case Study
Accelerate Production for Spirit AeroSystems
The manufacture and assembly of massive fuselage assemblies and other large structures generates a river of data. In fact, the bill of materials for a single fuselage alone can be millions of rows of data. In-house production processes and testing, as well as other manufacturers and customers created data flows that overwhelmed previous processes and information systems. Spirit’s customer base had grown substantially since their 2005 divestiture from Boeing, resulting in a $41 billion backlog of orders to fill. To address this backlog, meet increased customer demands and minimize additional capital investment, the company needed a way to improve throughput in the existing operational footprint. Spirit had a requirement from customers to increase fuselage production by 30%. To accomplish this goal, Spirit needed real-time information on its value chain and workflow. However, the two terabytes of data being pulled from their SAP ECC was unmanageable and overloaded their business warehouse. It had become time-consuming and difficult to pull aggregate data, disaggregate it for the needed information and then reassemble to create a report. During the 6-8 hours it took to build a report, another work shift (they run three per day) would have already taken place, thus the report content was out-of-date before it was ever delivered. As a result, supervisors often had to rely on manual efforts to provide charts, reports and analysis.
