Customer Company Size
Large Corporate
Region
- Europe
Country
- Germany
Product
- IBM DB2
- IBM AIX
- IBM Power Systems servers
- IBM System Storage DS8000
- SAP ERP
Tech Stack
- IBM DB2
- IBM AIX
- SAP ERP
Implementation Scale
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
- Cost Savings
- Productivity Improvements
Technology Category
- Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) - Cloud Databases
- Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) - Cloud Computing
Applicable Industries
- Aerospace
Applicable Functions
- Business Operation
Use Cases
- Process Control & Optimization
- Predictive Maintenance
Services
- Cloud Planning, Design & Implementation Services
- System Integration
About The Customer
For 75 years, Fraport AG has been a leading airport operator. Frankfurt Airport is one of the top ten airports worldwide. Furthermore, Fraport is a major shareholder in a two other companies that operate twelve additional airports on four continents. In total, it transports more than 164.7 million passengers and 3.6 million tonnes of cargo every year. Fraport Group has 20,000 employees worldwide, and achieved sales of nearly €2.2 billion in 2010. Like all aspects of air transport, the airport management industry is highly competitive and operates on very tight margins. As a result, Fraport maintains a continual focus on operational efficiency, seeking to cut costs across every aspects of its business while maintaining and improving service levels. The company’s IT teams make a key contribution to this cost reduction effort – both by developing innovative solutions that automate business processes, and by minimising the operational costs of the systems themselves.
The Challenge
Fraport AG operates Frankfurt International Airport and is involved in 12 other airports around the world. To succeed in this highly competitive industry, the company needs to keep its costs as low as possible while maintaining excellent service levels. The SAP® systems are a key component of operations at Frankfurt International Airport; but data volumes were growing rapidly, making these systems increasingly expensive to support. Due to these large data volumes – and the resultant need for additional high-speed disk storage and processing power – the cost of maintaining the SAP environment was rising rapidly. Fraport began to look for ways to improve the situation, and IBM suggested migrating from Oracle to the DB2 database platform.
The Solution
Working with IBM®, the company migrated its SAP applications from the Oracle database platform to IBM DB2®. Following a successful proof of concept project and a month of careful planning, the main migration of the 26 SAP systems hosted in the data centre in Frankfurt was completed within just five months. Subsequently, Fraport AG upgraded its server landscape to the latest IBM POWER7® technology, delivering further benefits. Using the same migration process that had been established during the proof of concept, the Fraport team was able to migrate 26 SAP systems (including production, development and quality assurance environments) from Oracle to DB2 within a period of just five months. The main applications include SAP ERP 6.0, SAP ERP Human Capital Management (HCM), SAP Customer Relationship Management (CRM), SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), SAP NetWeaver Portal, SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW), and SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI).
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
Case Study
Developing Smart Tools for the Airbus Factory
Manufacturing and assembly of aircraft, which involves tens of thousands of steps that must be followed by the operators, and a single mistake in the process could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix, makes the room for error very small.
Case Study
Accelerate Production for Spirit AeroSystems
The manufacture and assembly of massive fuselage assemblies and other large structures generates a river of data. In fact, the bill of materials for a single fuselage alone can be millions of rows of data. In-house production processes and testing, as well as other manufacturers and customers created data flows that overwhelmed previous processes and information systems. Spirit’s customer base had grown substantially since their 2005 divestiture from Boeing, resulting in a $41 billion backlog of orders to fill. To address this backlog, meet increased customer demands and minimize additional capital investment, the company needed a way to improve throughput in the existing operational footprint. Spirit had a requirement from customers to increase fuselage production by 30%. To accomplish this goal, Spirit needed real-time information on its value chain and workflow. However, the two terabytes of data being pulled from their SAP ECC was unmanageable and overloaded their business warehouse. It had become time-consuming and difficult to pull aggregate data, disaggregate it for the needed information and then reassemble to create a report. During the 6-8 hours it took to build a report, another work shift (they run three per day) would have already taken place, thus the report content was out-of-date before it was ever delivered. As a result, supervisors often had to rely on manual efforts to provide charts, reports and analysis.