Element Fleet Management > Case Studies > Leasing vs. Equipment Rental

Leasing vs. Equipment Rental

Element Fleet Management Logo
Customer Company Size
Large Corporate
Region
  • America
Country
  • United States
Product
  • Accident Service
  • Financing Service
  • Fleet Partnership
  • Maintenance Service
  • Personal Usage & Expense Tracking
Tech Stack
  • Telematics
  • Title, Licensing & Registration
Implementation Scale
  • Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
  • Cost Savings
Technology Category
  • Functional Applications - Fleet Management Systems (FMS)
Applicable Functions
  • Logistics & Transportation
Use Cases
  • Fleet Management
Services
  • System Integration
About The Customer
The customer is a business services company that operates a service fleet. The fleet consists of 150 forklifts spread over 80 branch locations. The company utilizes a variety of services including accident service, financing, fleet partnership, maintenance, personal usage & expense tracking, rental, telematics, and title, licensing & registration.
The Challenge
The customer was looking for a way to reduce the total cost of its material handling equipment used in its warehouses across the country. The customer’s corporate office had no visibility into its forklift inventory or related costs within each of its 80 branch locations. Several branches have low asset usage needs and believed rentals were a better option than leasing new equipment.
The Solution
As part of the fleet implementation, Element Fleet Management gathered and analyzed the client’s equipment inventory – something that had not been done before. They identified three branches where high cost rentals were being used. Their equipment experts located/purchased forklifts that fit their specific needs, while focusing on providing leasing options that cost less than current rental fees.
Operational Impact
  • The customer saved nearly 70% by leasing rather than renting material handling equipment.
  • Element Fleet Management monitors all the customer’s other rental units, eliminating rentals that sit for long periods of time without being used.
Quantitative Benefit
  • $82,380 in annual savings on equipment assets in three branch locations
  • Increased visibility into inventory and costs

Case Study missing?

Start adding your own!

Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.

Add New Record

Related Case Studies.

Contact us

Let's talk!
* Required
* Required
* Required
* Invalid email address
By submitting this form, you agree that IoT ONE may contact you with insights and marketing messaging.
No thanks, I don't want to receive any marketing emails from IoT ONE.
Submit

Thank you for your message!
We will contact you soon.