Company Size
1,000+
Region
- Europe
Country
- United Kingdom
Product
- LivePerson
Tech Stack
- Live chat
- Business rules engine
Implementation Scale
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
- Cost Savings
- Customer Satisfaction
- Revenue Growth
Technology Category
- Application Infrastructure & Middleware - API Integration & Management
Applicable Industries
- Aerospace
Applicable Functions
- Sales & Marketing
Services
- System Integration
About The Customer
Virgin Atlantic is the UK's second largest long-haul airline, flying to 30 global destinations. Since its launch in 1984, the airline has continually broken new ground in airline passenger service, with a mission statement of building an airline “where people love to fly and where people love to work.” Virgin Atlantic differentiates strongly on customer experience, offering end-to-end differentiated service starting at the point of booking via their website. The airline is committed to pushing innovation in all areas of customer service, holding true to their brand motto of “everyday pioneers.”
The Challenge
Virgin Atlantic, the UK's second largest long-haul airline, prides itself on offering a high level of customer service, starting from the point of booking via their website. However, managing fluctuating levels of customer enquiries, particularly via email, was proving to be a significant challenge. The average query took at least three emails and 48 hours to resolve. The airline needed to find a way to improve this response time without increasing costs. Additionally, Virgin Atlantic wanted to improve ticket sales conversion rates and catch website visitors who were dropping off before completing the booking process.
The Solution
LivePerson was appointed to implement online engagement across two areas of operation: Sales, where live chat was deployed within the booking funnel to increase booking conversion, and Service, where the priority was deflecting enquiries from email to live chat. Once installed in the sales funnel, LivePerson’s sophisticated business rules engine worked intelligently, identifying and prioritising higher revenue customers, determining precisely at which point to offer help during the booking process. Live chat was deployed only where it would drive incremental revenue or increase average order values. For instance, if a customer showed interest in cabin class, that visitor became a priority to whom assistance would be offered. The system also located where customers became potentially confused or distressed, by detecting simple user-driven errors on the route-planning engine. Live chat was then intuitively offered at that moment to rescue the sale. In the service area, by replacing the “click here to email” button with an invitation to chat on the contact page, visitors were proactively encouraged to use live chat as a first point of contact.
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
Related Case Studies.
![](/files/casestudy/Airbus-Soars-with-Wearable-Technology.png)
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
![](/files/casestudy/Aircraft-Predictive-Maintenance-and-Workflow-Optimization.png)
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
![](/files/casestudy/Aerospace---Defense-Case-Study-Airbus.png)
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
![](/files/casestudy/Developing-Smart-Tools-for-the-Airbus-Factory.png)
Case Study
Developing Smart Tools for the Airbus Factory
Manufacturing and assembly of aircraft, which involves tens of thousands of steps that must be followed by the operators, and a single mistake in the process could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix, makes the room for error very small.
![](/files/casestudy/Accelerate-Production-for-Spirit-AeroSystems.png)
Case Study
Accelerate Production for Spirit AeroSystems
The manufacture and assembly of massive fuselage assemblies and other large structures generates a river of data. In fact, the bill of materials for a single fuselage alone can be millions of rows of data. In-house production processes and testing, as well as other manufacturers and customers created data flows that overwhelmed previous processes and information systems. Spirit’s customer base had grown substantially since their 2005 divestiture from Boeing, resulting in a $41 billion backlog of orders to fill. To address this backlog, meet increased customer demands and minimize additional capital investment, the company needed a way to improve throughput in the existing operational footprint. Spirit had a requirement from customers to increase fuselage production by 30%. To accomplish this goal, Spirit needed real-time information on its value chain and workflow. However, the two terabytes of data being pulled from their SAP ECC was unmanageable and overloaded their business warehouse. It had become time-consuming and difficult to pull aggregate data, disaggregate it for the needed information and then reassemble to create a report. During the 6-8 hours it took to build a report, another work shift (they run three per day) would have already taken place, thus the report content was out-of-date before it was ever delivered. As a result, supervisors often had to rely on manual efforts to provide charts, reports and analysis.