To Infinity and Beyond Aerospace Industry Finds Resilience in the Cloud
Company Size
200-1,000
Region
- America
- Europe
Country
- Germany
- Italy
- United States
Product
- IBM Cloud
- IBM’s Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service
Tech Stack
- Cloud Computing
- Disaster Recovery
- ERP Systems
Implementation Scale
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
- Cost Savings
- Productivity Improvements
Technology Category
- Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) - Cloud Computing
Applicable Industries
- Aerospace
Applicable Functions
- Discrete Manufacturing
- Procurement
Use Cases
- Supply Chain Visibility
Services
- Cloud Planning, Design & Implementation Services
- System Integration
About The Customer
UmbraGroup is a privately held company headquartered in Foligno, Italy. The company is a strategic supplier to aerospace companies including Boeing, Airbus, British Airways, Lufthansa, KLM, Lockheed Martin, Trumpf and Mori Seiki. These companies depend on UmbraGroup’s high-precision mechanical components to keep their aircraft in the air and their machinery running. The group’s industrial and energy clients also depend on a steady supply of UmbraGroup’s screws, bearings and electromechanical parts. UmbraGroup has operations in Germany and the United States. The company completed a two-year consolidation of the group’s Enterprise Resource Planning system in 2012, combining all four companies under one IT umbrella.
The Challenge
UmbraGroup, an Italian manufacturer, is a strategic supplier to aerospace companies globally. The company's clients depend on UmbraGroup’s high-precision mechanical components to keep their aircraft in the air and their machinery running. In today’s operating environment of just-in-time supply chain management, these companies demand a lot from their suppliers. UmbraGroup needed to ensure its resiliency as a key supplier. The importance of resiliency for UmbraGroup took on added urgency as it began acquiring new operations, including two manufacturers in Germany and one in the United States. The company had to ensure the worldwide availability of their systems across multiple time zones, well beyond their headquarters and main datacenter in Foligno. In addition to the usual resiliency challenges, earthquakes are a fact of life in central Italy. UmbraGroup needed to be sure that even an earthquake won’t stop production and shipment to clients.
The Solution
UmbraGroup turned to IBM, an internationally recognized IT partner, to ensure its resiliency as a key supplier. IBM was able to take UmbraGroup’s requirements and find the right balance among performance, service levels and costs. IBM’s cloud offering is built in a modular way and has a pay-for-what-you-use pricing. The cloud offering relies on pre-configured hardware and dynamic provisioning to replicate everything to a remote datacenter, so the time to implement is minimal. IBM and UmbraGroup are designing a continuity plan that defines all the procedures and dependencies in operations as well as technology. They are working through every process to make sure that no step is dependent on a single individual. The objective is to have a failover plan that covers all operations in case of emergency—a plan that can reduce dependencies or identify a way to work around them if necessary.
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
Case Study
Developing Smart Tools for the Airbus Factory
Manufacturing and assembly of aircraft, which involves tens of thousands of steps that must be followed by the operators, and a single mistake in the process could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix, makes the room for error very small.
Case Study
Accelerate Production for Spirit AeroSystems
The manufacture and assembly of massive fuselage assemblies and other large structures generates a river of data. In fact, the bill of materials for a single fuselage alone can be millions of rows of data. In-house production processes and testing, as well as other manufacturers and customers created data flows that overwhelmed previous processes and information systems. Spirit’s customer base had grown substantially since their 2005 divestiture from Boeing, resulting in a $41 billion backlog of orders to fill. To address this backlog, meet increased customer demands and minimize additional capital investment, the company needed a way to improve throughput in the existing operational footprint. Spirit had a requirement from customers to increase fuselage production by 30%. To accomplish this goal, Spirit needed real-time information on its value chain and workflow. However, the two terabytes of data being pulled from their SAP ECC was unmanageable and overloaded their business warehouse. It had become time-consuming and difficult to pull aggregate data, disaggregate it for the needed information and then reassemble to create a report. During the 6-8 hours it took to build a report, another work shift (they run three per day) would have already taken place, thus the report content was out-of-date before it was ever delivered. As a result, supervisors often had to rely on manual efforts to provide charts, reports and analysis.
