Storm Resources Enriching and Future-Proofing Supplier Management Systems for an Oil & Gas Client
Customer Company Size
Large Corporate
Region
- America
Country
- Canada
Product
- Avetta Connect
Tech Stack
- Supplier Management System
- Compliance Management
- Insurance Monitoring System
Implementation Scale
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
- Cost Savings
- Customer Satisfaction
- Digital Expertise
- Productivity Improvements
Technology Category
- Functional Applications - Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS)
- Functional Applications - Enterprise Asset Management Systems (EAM)
- Functional Applications - Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP)
Applicable Industries
- Oil & Gas
Applicable Functions
- Business Operation
- Procurement
- Quality Assurance
Services
- System Integration
- Testing & Certification
- Training
About The Customer
Storm Resources Ltd. is an oil and gas exploration and development company incorporated in the province of Alberta, Canada on June 8, 2010. Currently, the company operates primarily in northeast British Columbia and has a focused asset base with large land positions in resource plays at Umbach/Nig Creek/Fireweed which has multi-year drilling upside. Near term, Storm’s efforts are focused on advancing the development of the liquids-rich Montney natural gas resource on 170 net sections of land at Umbach, Nig Creek, and Fireweed.
The Challenge
The client was facing challenges in its documentation and compliance classification for its suppliers based on the “stale” data being provided. This meant that certain key indicators that the client needed to verify its supplier’s capabilities were often outdated, unverified, or lacking quality insights. Between 2008-2012, compliance and operational data provided by 50% of the client’s suppliers wasn’t updated in the given time span. Simply put, the data being provided was not fresh, current, or reliable in most cases. The challenges associated with sub-optimal supplier data are only exacerbated the larger an organization gets – a factor that was applicable for Storm Resources as well. This was further complicated by the provincial WCB industry coding system used for audits in Canada. For example, Alberta alone had over 600 different industry codes to manage different industries across the province, so when paired with various other territories in the country it would be a significant logistical burden to assign the right codes to the right supplier audits. The client needed a supplier management partner to lighten their burden with regards to prequalification, compliance, and supplier management. Specifically, the client wanted a supplier management partner that would help them facilitate the processes and not drive their business as a whole.
The Solution
After discovering the company, the client found that Avetta’s robust prequalification and supplier management processes aligned perfectly with their business needs. With their quality over volume approach to data, Avetta worked in close collaboration with the client to adapt their pre-existing qualification process to better capture and review data from their supplier list. The client already possessed a good clean list of their suppliers, which they further refined to provide Avetta with the best possible starting point. With the help of the Avetta Connect application, the insights gathered from the audit procedure were used to reinforce processes such as underwriting, insurance certification, and compliance through COR, federal and provincial regulations. This was particularly important for the client due to the nature of COR certification and its links with industry and worker compensations, which is vital for safety processes and government subsidization in the related industry. While several other management partners have had the propensity to try and undervalue COR’s capacity in favor of their own audit processes, Avetta’s approach was more open to using COR as part of the client’s system. This approach enhanced the WCB, Industry, supplier and client’s recognized audit process significantly and reinforced what the client had been striving to achieve for the longest time: a contractor management system where suppliers work in partnership with the client to drive business.
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Taking Oil and Gas Exploration to the Next Level
DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG) wanted to increase computing performance by 5 to 10 times to improve seismic processing. The solution must build on current architecture software investments without sacrificing existing software and scale computing without scaling IT infrastructure costs.
Case Study
Remote Wellhead Monitoring
Each wellhead was equipped with various sensors and meters that needed to be monitored and controlled from a central HMI, often miles away from the assets in the field. Redundant solar and wind generators were installed at each wellhead to support the electrical needs of the pumpstations, temperature meters, cameras, and cellular modules. In addition to asset management and remote control capabilities, data logging for remote surveillance and alarm notifications was a key demand from the customer. Terra Ferma’s solution needed to be power efficient, reliable, and capable of supporting high-bandwidth data-feeds. They needed a multi-link cellular connection to a central server that sustained reliable and redundant monitoring and control of flow meters, temperature sensors, power supply, and event-logging; including video and image files. This open-standard network needed to interface with the existing SCADA and proprietary network management software.
Case Study
Refinery Saves Over $700,000 with Smart Wireless
One of the largest petroleum refineries in the world is equipped to refine various types of crude oil and manufacture various grades of fuel from motor gasoline to Aviation Turbine Fuel. Due to wear and tear, eight hydrogen valves in each refinery were leaking, and each cost $1800 per ton of hydrogen vented. The plant also had leakage on nearly 30 flare control hydrocarbon valves. The refinery wanted a continuous, online monitoring system that could catch leaks early, minimize hydrogen and hydrocarbon production losses, and improve safety for maintenance.