Customer Company Size
Large Corporate
Region
- America
- Asia
Country
- United States
- Australia
- Canada
- Thailand
Product
- Forcepoint SimShield
Tech Stack
- Cross Domain Solutions
- Test and Training Enabling Network Architecture (TENA) protocol
Implementation Scale
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
- Cost Savings
- Productivity Improvements
Technology Category
- Cybersecurity & Privacy - Network Security
Applicable Industries
- National Security & Defense
Use Cases
- Cybersecurity
Services
- System Integration
- Training
About The Customer
Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) and the 353d Combat Training Squadron (353d CTS) operate and manage the premiere joint combat training venue – RED FLAG-Alaska (RF-A). RF-A exercises are held at the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) at Eielson Air Force Base and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. JPARC is the largest instrumented air, ground, and electronic combat training range in the world. With multiple joint and coalition forces exercises per year, RF-A provides relevant and real-world air and ground combat scenarios with realistic threats and targets. As many as 90 aircraft and 2,000 personnel participate in the RF-A tactical exercises that cover 66,000 square miles of training airspace and 1.6 million acres of often-rugged land in the joint Air Force/Army-managed JPARC. The JPARC encompasses more than $200 million worth of equipment and instrumentation to support warfighter training exercises.
The Challenge
The Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) and the 353d Combat Training Squadron (353d CTS) operate and manage the premiere joint combat training venue – RED FLAG-Alaska (RF-A). RF-A exercises are held at the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) at Eielson Air Force Base and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. JPARC is the largest instrumented air, ground, and electronic combat training range in the world. With multiple joint and coalition forces exercises per year, RF-A provides relevant and real-world air and ground combat scenarios with realistic threats and targets. As many as 90 aircraft and 2,000 personnel participate in the RF-A tactical exercises that cover 66,000 square miles of training airspace and 1.6 million acres of often-rugged land in the joint Air Force/Army-managed JPARC. The JPARC encompasses more than $200 million worth of equipment and instrumentation to support warfighter training exercises. In addition to size and cost, PACAF has the added responsibility to ensure that sensitive data is not accessed or leaked to unauthorized parties or systems – especially critical when training multinational coalition forces. To provide the most realistic training for the warfighter, which includes multiple nations and clearance levels, a cross domain solution was needed. To best support the required live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) aspects of the joint training, this cross domain solution had to be near-real time, support a flexible protocol, and be able to obtain an authority to connect (ATC) at the Secret and Below Interoperability (SABI) level.
The Solution
To mitigate the issues of securing sensitive data while allowing participants at different clearance levels to train together, PACAF adopted the Forcepoint SimShield cross domain solution. Forcepoint SimShield allows for secure, bi-directional interoperability among LVC assets that are dissimilarly classified. Forcepoint SimShield supports the standards-based, Test and Training Enabling Network Architecture (TENA) protocol utilized by JPARC and JDEWR. By deploying Forcepoint SimShield within the architecture, JPARC can utilize secure bi-directional integration and interaction of all equipment and sub-systems throughout the training environment. The Forcepoint SimShield deployment in the JPARC environment was certified and accredited in June 2009 and subsequently placed on the Unified Cross Domain Management Office (UCDMO) Baseline list. Forcepoint SimShield is currently the only TENA cross domain solution on the UCDMO Baseline list.
Operational Impact
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Data Capture for Afghanistan Forces
Electronic equipments on the field of Afghanistan provided information on the status of the vehicle and to identify potential threats surrounding it to the British Force. The monitoring and interpretation of this data requires robust and sophisticated digitization for data capture and communication.
Case Study
Major Aerospace Company Automates Asset Management
The O&M division of an aerospace and global security company was using spreadsheets to manually track more than 3,000 assets assigned to students and staff. Maintaining audit trails for this high volume of equipment became increasingly time-consuming and challenging. The chore involved knowing precisely what equipment was on hand, what had been issued, its location and the name of the custodial owner of each item. Every aspect of this task was carried owner of each item. Every aspect of this task was carried out by individuals with spreadsheets. Manually documenting the full lifecycle of each asset added to the burden. This included tracking maintenance requirements and records, incidents and damages, repairs, calibrations, depreciation, and end-of-life data.
Case Study
Securing a Large Data Center in the EMEA Region: An IoT Case Study
A leading data-center operator in the EMEA region, with multiple facilities spanning over 25,000 square meters, faced significant security challenges. The operator experienced interruptions in their internal IT network due to unsupervised work of third-party technicians. Despite having a high-end building control system that provided 24x7 monitoring and control to all the building’s infrastructure, the data center was vulnerable from a cyber perspective as it was connected to the IT network infrastructure. The operator launched an urgent OT cyber security project that included both IT-OT network segmentation and OT network asset mapping and anomaly detection. The main objectives were to harden the security of the server systems, secure the facility’s power supply and server cooling system, strengthen the segmentation between building and operational systems, create a visual OT network map, and set up a system for presenting supply-chain attacks that may threaten the data center through equipment vendors’ maintenance activities.
Case Study
Enhancing Security Precision with IoT: A Case Study of Guardsman Group
Guardsman Group, a leading security company in the Caribbean, faced a significant challenge in maintaining the security of its digital infrastructure. The company provides security equipment, personnel, and systems for various businesses across the region. However, one of its offices experienced a security incident that affected all communications at that location. The existing security tools were not sufficient to provide the necessary protection, and it took hours to identify the source of the issue. This incident highlighted the need for a dynamic solution that could proactively identify threats. The company's primary concern was any disruption to its business, as it manages a significant portion of Jamaica's money and cannot afford for its operations to go down.
Case Study
LoRaWAN - Helping citizens and organizations to reduce environmental impact
More and more, our world is becoming aware about the environmental print that comes with population growth, limitation of resources, climate change and the need for sustainability. The biggest challange here was to raise awareness among citizens and organizations about their environmental impact, and to help themto reduce it in a sustainable way with the help of Real time data.
Case Study
Enhancing City Security through IoT: A Case Study of Atlanta
The city of Atlanta, with a resident population of over 420,000 and a metropolitan area of more than five million people, faced the challenge of ensuring the safety and security of its citizens and visitors. As a leading tourist destination and a multicultural city attracting global investment, Atlanta had to deal with the complexities of managing safety and security incidents. Over the years, the city had invested in various surveillance systems, providing visual intelligence to law enforcement and security professionals. However, these systems operated independently and were spread across a wide geography. The city aimed to increase collaboration among government agencies and create a shared Video Integration Center (VIC). The challenge was the disparate nature of the video systems, which were based on proprietary technologies and were both analog and IP based. The city also wanted to leverage the numerous private cameras located across the city, further complicating the integration of all these systems into one common platform.