Case Studies > Optimizing Agent Incentives with APT Test & Learn

Optimizing Agent Incentives with APT Test & Learn

Customer Company Size
Large Corporate
Region
  • America
Country
  • United States
Product
  • APT Test & Learn
Tech Stack
  • Data Analytics
  • Machine Learning
Implementation Scale
  • Enterprise-wide Deployment
Impact Metrics
  • Revenue Growth
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Productivity Improvements
Technology Category
  • Analytics & Modeling - Predictive Analytics
  • Analytics & Modeling - Real Time Analytics
Applicable Industries
  • Finance & Insurance
Applicable Functions
  • Sales & Marketing
  • Business Operation
Services
  • Data Science Services
  • System Integration
About The Customer
The customer is a leading insurance provider that works with a network of independent agencies. The company is large, with over 1,000 employees, and operates primarily in the United States. The insurance provider aims to enhance its agency compensation strategies to drive performance and reward incremental growth. By leveraging advanced analytics and data-driven decision-making, the company seeks to optimize its incentive programs to achieve better results and higher efficiency.
The Challenge
A leading insurance provider wanted to optimize the incentive portfolio it offered to independent agencies but had difficulty measuring the true impact of each incentive. The challenge was to accurately isolate the incremental benefit of different incentive programs on agency performance. The provider needed to understand which incentives worked best for different types of agencies and how to target them effectively to maximize returns.
The Solution
Using APT’s Test & Learn software, the insurance provider was able to test and compare the performance of different incentive programs. The software allowed the provider to identify the optimal incentive type and frequency for each agent or agency type. It also helped determine areas where incentives could be communicated through lower-cost, digital channels. By designing tests for new incentives and discontinuing unprofitable ones, the provider could validate the effectiveness of its strategies. The solution also included creating a process to remind high-potential agents about incentives predicted to drive the greatest incremental policies.
Operational Impact
  • The insurance provider was able to identify the optimal incentive type and frequency for each agent or agency type.
  • The provider determined areas where incentives could be communicated through lower-cost, digital channels.
  • The company worked with agents who had not responded profitably to existing incentives to identify feasible alternatives.
  • Tests for new incentives were designed to validate their effectiveness, and unprofitable incentives were discontinued.
  • A process was created to remind high-potential agents about incentives predicted to drive the greatest incremental policies.
Quantitative Benefit
  • Premiums increased by 4.2% vs. control for Incentive A.
  • Premiums increased by 6.1% vs. control for Incentive B.
  • Incremental premiums for Incentive A were $29.6MM with a $3.65 premium per payout dollar.
  • Incremental premiums for Incentive B were $52.0MM with a $2.90 premium per payout dollar.
  • APT optimized rollout resulted in $49.1MM incremental premiums with a $6.79 premium per payout dollar.

Case Study missing?

Start adding your own!

Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.

Add New Record

Related Case Studies.

Contact us

Let's talk!
* Required
* Required
* Required
* Invalid email address
By submitting this form, you agree that IoT ONE may contact you with insights and marketing messaging.
No thanks, I don't want to receive any marketing emails from IoT ONE.
Submit

Thank you for your message!
We will contact you soon.